Contact

Spring Gillard
info@gardenheart.ca

Writers’ Rights

When the Diary was published, I registered with Access Copyright. The nonprofit represents thousands of writers, visual artists and publishers across the country. They license the use of copyrighted material to educational institutions, governmental bodies and others. Now I receive a small annual payment to compensate me for both the book and all the newspaper and magazine articles I have written. I was surprised to find that in academia, authors do not retain the copyright to their own work, rather it is owned by the publisher. No shock then that the two viewpoints are clashing. I suppose it is easier to give up your rights when you are getting a regular, healthy paycheque along with rich benefits. Below is the background on the dispute from Access Copyright and you can watch the short video above. Do you think this new deal is fair?

What is educational “fair dealing”?

Over the past 18 months nearly every Canadian university, college and school board outside Quebec has adopted “fair dealing” content use guidelines closely mirroring those distributed by CMEC in the 3rd edition of Copyright Matters!

While some will point to this as proof of emerging consensus on “fair dealing” best practices for education, it is not the type of broad-based consensus that leads to constructive, lasting solutions.

Among those who produce content for educators and students there is grave concern over the effect these policies are already having on the industry and what it will mean for the future availability of Canadian content in our classrooms. There is also disappointment at the coordinated promotion of practices that appear hostile towards domestic publishing for education.

These new policies authorize and encourage copying based on a definition of “fair dealing” that is not supported by the law. Instead, they represent what some of the education sector’s lawyers and administrators would like the law to be. Nothing in the new copyright act or recent Supreme Court decisions suggests that “fair dealing” for education extends to the deliberate, systematic copying of published content for aggregation and delivery to support student instruction.

There is little doubt that the content and copyright landscapes are evolving. Over the past decade educational copying has migrated away from central photocopying hubs towards convenient, digital file sharing. And factors like Open Access resources and library database subscriptions are a significant part of the mix today, though usage continues to extend well beyond these areas.

Despite all the current debate around scope of educational “fair dealing,” any evaluation of fairness will necessarily involve an assessment of usage. That is why developing a fact-based understanding of usage should be a matter of integrity for all concerned. Fairness, after all, can’t be endangered by the facts.

The data we’ve collected shows that educators today share more content with students than ever before, whether it’s by handout, printed coursepack, emailed attachment, upload to learning management system, or other means. With articles from magazines, newspapers and journals; chapters from books and textbooks; sections of published non-fiction, literature, photography, art; and much more; educators create customized reading and viewing that supports curriculum.

The value of flexible content use for educators and students is without question. However continued access to valued Canadian content is unsustainable without a system that fairly rewards creators and publishers. At Access Copyright we believe that copyright should work for everyone and that’s why we’re dedicated to finding new and innovative ways to serve the education community’s content and copyright needs.

Please view our video about the need for balanced “fair dealing” policies in education, share it with your peers, and join the conversation. #AccessCopyright #FairDealingBalance

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>